I happened to need to use and XML Parser for the first time and found
inspecting the structure awkward, so I added some GTInspector extensions to
XML-Parser. This is uploaded as XML-Parser-BenComan.304 to
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/XMLParser.  Could someone who uses
XML regularly check if these are reasonable?

Now should these methods be packaged separately somehow, since they are
likely not of interest to other Smalltalk flavours?

btw I gave them a protocol of "GT-Extensions" - but I also considered
"moldable-tools" and "tools-extensions".  If there a preference?  This will
likely be a common occurrence across the community, so we should try for a
consistent convention across the community for such extensions.

btw2, I notice that #gtDisplayOn: implementors are fairly evenly split
between [GT-InspectorExtensions-Core] and [GT-SpotterExtensions-Core].  Are
they really separated like this in their use?

cheers -ben

Reply via email to