kilon.alios wrote > Yes sure , I agree, but why that does not apply to Pharo ?
Pharo as a principle has prioritized "do the right thing" over backward compatibility, and by consequence to lose users who won't accept that. Now amazingly, in practice, migration has for the most-part been a breeze, partly because a lot of the mess is buried way down in the system internals where user code isn't usually directly dependent. So I would say it doesn't apply to Pharo because Pharo is playing a different game. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Slides-from-the-Pharo-Status-talk-at-FOSDEM-2015-tp4803290p4803456.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
