kilon.alios wrote > If you mean something more than that, then I am open to other opinions as > always :)
The only meaning I connected to C++ and Ruby were that they were dogmatically and widely enough approved for use to be rigid by necessity. Based on some of your comments, I assume I probably could have used Python as an example of a language that got popular enough to expand beyond people that truly "get it", and thus have significant push back to non-backward-compatibility in the community. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Slides-from-the-Pharo-Status-talk-at-FOSDEM-2015-tp4803290p4803435.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
