On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Trygve Reenskaug <tryg...@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> It's a fact of life that leverage implies rigidity. A rubber crowbar is > flexible, but useless. > Our challenge is, as I see it, to determine the minimum we need to keep > rigid in order to get maximum leverage for doing the rest. > --Trygve > Very insightful point. Case in point: most frameworks. Bootstrap, Seaside, ... All add rigidity but also structure. Phil > > On 03.02.2015 14:34, Marcus Denker wrote: > > > On 03 Feb 2015, at 14:29, Sebastian Sastre <sebast...@flowingconcept.com> > wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2015, at 11:18 AM, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But the more user it will get the more inflexible will become to change. > That's a big price to pay for abandoning the nomad life. > > > Note that, that statement, is not exactly true. > > The more users it gets, the more social pressure the community will put > on it. > > That happens. > > But... > > Flexibility is function of design and not coupled with community size. > > > And it is a good problem to solve: We need to change the language to make > it easier evolvable. > A very nice research topic. > (which in a second step then can be feed back into the system, making > future evolution easier) > > Marcus > > > -- > > The essence of object orientation is that > objects collaborate to achieve a goal. > --- > Trygve Reenskaug mailto: tryg...@ifi.uio.no <%20tryg...@ifi.uio.no> > Morgedalsvn. 5A http://folk.uio.no/trygver/ > N-0378 Oslo http://fullOO.info > Norway Tel: (+47) 22 49 57 27 >
