Andy Burnett wrote:
Do have have a specific url? http://spec.st looks fine to me.
It has not been explained beyond it being mostly a personality clash. There was some final technical issue that went against some existing Smalltalk conventions, but there was not much discussion brought to the community on that conflict. Note the Spec code already in Pharo is MIT licensed, so there is no concern about that. I guess in a way it shows how the MIT is more-free than the GPL, that such can occur. Of course, the reverse cannot. I would be concerned about loading external-Spec into a Pharo based project. Although the new dual license seems written to allow parties other than Pharo to use external-Spec in a non-GPL project, the implications of how that might contaminate a Pharo based project is not clear. Also I guess discussion of external-Spec probably won't proceed on this list, so until I see news of a separate Spec mailing list to collaborate with users and other developers, it would seem that developer has struck out on his own. Pharo-internal-Spec will continue development here under the MIT license. cheers -ben |
- [Pharo-users] Strange colour reversal on the Spec site Andy Burnett
- Re: [Pharo-users] Strange colour reversal on the Spec s... Ben Coman
- Re: [Pharo-users] Strange colour reversal on the Spec s... stepharo
- Re: [Pharo-users] Strange colour reversal on the Sp... Johan Fabry
- Re: [Pharo-users] Strange colour reversal on th... Alain Busser
- Re: [Pharo-users] Strange colour reversal o... Damien Pollet
- Re: [Pharo-users] Strange colour reversal on the Spec s... Andy Burnett