On 25 Jul 2014, at 21:25, Dale Henrichs <dale.henri...@gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
> Sven, > > I'm using Pharo3.0 and it appears that the .st scripts have to be located in > the same directory as the image and changes files ... I see that you are > using Pharo4.0 ... > > So is it possible to get Pharo3.0 to work on .st files in arbitary directores? Are you using the shebang or direct version ? In any case, I am always using absolute paths. Does that not work for you ? > Dale > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > > On 24 Jul 2014, at 16:34, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > > > One question I have is how fast the load of an image and processing by an > > image is when compared with bash. > > Obviously, it is slower, there is a whole image that needs to be loaded, etc. > > $ cat test.st > #!/Users/sven/tmp/pharo4/pharo-vm/Pharo.app/Contents/MacOS/Pharo --headless > /Users/sven/tmp/pharo4/Pharo.image st --quit > FileStream stdout nextPutAll: 42 factorial asString; cr. > > $ time ./test.st > 1405006117752879898543142606244511569936384000000000 > > real 0m0.644s > user 0m0.516s > sys 0m0.067s > > So about half a second overhead. > > Sven >
