That book is too advanced I think. On 31 Mar 2014, at 19:07, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Roelof Wobben <r.wob...@home.nl> wrote: > Ben Coman schreef op 31-3-2014 18:30: > Roelof Wobben wrote: > Hello, > > I almost get book 1 ready. > > Now I wonder if there are challenges so I can practise more in Smaltalk. > I know I learn the best by doing things and not just read about it. > > I like the most if the challenges can start at simple and get more complex . > > As example what I mean is 99 prolog/python problems > > Roelof > > > > I'm not aware of anything similar. It does look interesting and probably > something that should be looked into further. > > Alternatively, sorry its not a challenge, but as a next step I highly > recommend LaserGame tutorial > http://squeak.preeminent.org/tut2007/html/ > > for which you'll should Squeak 3.9 (a predecessor to Pharo) > http://ftp.squeak.org/3.9/ > > The great thing with this is it leads you through a uniquely Smalltalk > approach to developing that is colloquially known as "developing from within > the debugger" and it shows how to use Smalltalk facilities to refactor code > as the design evolves. From the tutorial "Every step of the process is > described in detail. Even when I made mistakes. The idea here is to show how > natural it is to iterate over design and implementation and the confidence > that builds with test driven development." > > This tutorial is one of the things that really hooked me into Smalltalk. > > cheers -ben > > > > > > Thanks, this looks very interresting. And I think at first glance it can be > done on Pharo also. > > If I have enough knowlegde Im thinking about tryimg to make a sort of > repo-browser for the linux distro I work on. > But that will take a long time before I am at that point. > > Roelof > > If you want to stretch the envelope, get a copy of this one: > > http://www.lulu.com/shop/andres-valloud/a-mentoring-course-on-smalltalk/paperback/product-3788890.html > > And make the exercises... > > You'll not be the same afterwards. > > Phil >
