and even if it would be unstable… issues needs to be always reported, is the only way to be aware :)
On 26 Feb 2014, at 07:45, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nautilus is not unstable. > That should not be happening and in fact I cannot reproduce it. > Please report. > > On 26 Feb 2014, at 01:57, Robert Shiplett <grshipl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am running from that latest.zip tonight and PackageTreeNautilusUI >>update >> is getting a walkback messageNoUnderstood for >> receiver of >>protocolsFor: is nil >> >> I simply flipped to class view in Announcements and then flipped that toggle >> back. >> >> Does this need to be reported, or is Nautilus still known to be unstable ? >> >> thanks >> >> I'll go back to my older 3.0 candidate for now ... >> >> R >> >> >> On 25 February 2014 19:02, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> none >> >> just download this one: >> >> http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip >> >> is always the latest effective build. >> >> Esteban >> >> On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:05, François Stephany <tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I'd like to download the latest Pharo 3 on the CI server but I don't know >> > which one I should download? >> > >> > The last one on the list? >> > <Screen Shot 2014-02-25 at 21.03.07.png> >> >> >> >
