On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: >> Agreed that the "whole new language" aspect seems like way too big a >> hammer, given what it actually does. > > Which would be easier to update when things change?
Regarding that both patches are equal compared to the current methods with strcmp. > Which would be possible to automatically generate from gram.y? None of those patches take this approach. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
