Stephen Frost wrote: > * Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote: > > Perhaps it'd be better to have pgsql-bugs be the "Package owner", who > > also gets emails about bug activity on their packages. That way, we > > could have a 'jdbc' package whose owner is pgsql-jdbc and pgsql-bugs > > wouldn't end up with that bug traffic (which, I believe, is what we'd > > want...). > > To clarify, I mean 'Maintainer', and this would be identical to how the > PostgreSQL packages in Debian are currently maintained: > > Maintainers for postgresql are Debian PostgreSQL Maintainers > <pkg-postgresql-pub...@lists.alioth.debian.org>. > > And, handily, that list is archived here: > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-postgresql-public/ > > One example of how it's used can be seen with this thread: > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-postgresql-public/2015-September/002803.html
So in the pipermail interface you get the impression that after three messages the thread stopped. But if you go to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797804 you realize that there's further traffic in the bug that wasn't sent to the list. That's ungood. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
