* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote: > Perhaps it'd be better to have pgsql-bugs be the "Package owner", who > also gets emails about bug activity on their packages. That way, we > could have a 'jdbc' package whose owner is pgsql-jdbc and pgsql-bugs > wouldn't end up with that bug traffic (which, I believe, is what we'd > want...).
To clarify, I mean 'Maintainer', and this would be identical to how the PostgreSQL packages in Debian are currently maintained: Maintainers for postgresql are Debian PostgreSQL Maintainers <pkg-postgresql-pub...@lists.alioth.debian.org>. And, handily, that list is archived here: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-postgresql-public/ One example of how it's used can be seen with this thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-postgresql-public/2015-September/002803.html Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
