Stephen Frost wrote: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > If you want such an API, I won't stop you from using it, but I will not > > use it myself. Please put in message-body commands as well. > > So, unsurprisingly, debbugs does support all commands that can be sent > to control@ also through the n...@bugs.postgresql.org system; the command > simply needs to be prefixed with 'Control: ' and then '-1' can be used > as the bug number (so you don't have to figure out what the right number > is, etc), like so: > > Control: close -1 > Control: tags -1 wontfix
Supposedly we will want our traffic to still flow via pgsql-b...@postgresql.org, so the trick of grabbing the bug number from the To address will not be available, will it? Hmm, I guess we could have the bug form add To: n...@bugs.postgresql.org CC: pgsql-b...@postgresql.org as headers, which should work for most people (since we reply-all), Josh Berkus being the exception. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
