> Sorry I typed the wrong key. > > So... Are you planning to give up on the ctidscan module and submit only > the module written by Hanada-san on top of postgres_fdw? As I imagine that > the goal is just to have a test module to run the APIs why would the module > submitted by Hanada-san be that necessary? > No. The ctidscan module is a reference implementation towards the existing custom-scan interface that just supports relation scan with own way, but no support for relations join at this moment.
The upcoming enhancement to postgres_fdw will support remote join, that looks like a scan on pseudo materialized relation on local side. It is the proof of the concept to the new interface I like to discuss in this thread. Thanks, -- NEC OSS Promotion Center / PG-Strom Project KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael.paqu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 6:17 PM > To: Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平) > Cc: Robert Haas; Tom Lane; pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Shigeru Hanada > Subject: Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [HACKERS] [v9.5] Custom Plan > API) > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Kouhei Kaigai > <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote: > > > > Where are we on this? AFAIK, we have now a feature with > no documentation > > and no example in-core to test those custom routine APIs, > hence moved to > > next CF. > > > Now Hanada-san is working on the example module that use > this new > infrastructure on top of postgres_fdw. Probably, he will > submit the > patch within a couple of days, for the upcoming commit fest. > > > > I am a bit surprised by that. Are you planning to give up on the > ctidscan module module and > > > > Sorry I typed the wrong key. > > So... Are you planning to give up on the ctidscan module and submit only > the module written by Hanada-san on top of postgres_fdw? As I imagine that > the goal is just to have a test module to run the APIs why would the module > submitted by Hanada-san be that necessary? > > -- > > Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
