On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> > wrote: > >> > Where are we on this? AFAIK, we have now a feature with no documentation >> > and no example in-core to test those custom routine APIs, hence moved to >> > next CF. >> > >> Now Hanada-san is working on the example module that use this new >> infrastructure on top of postgres_fdw. Probably, he will submit the >> patch within a couple of days, for the upcoming commit fest. >> > > I am a bit surprised by that. Are you planning to give up on the ctidscan > module module and > Sorry I typed the wrong key. So... Are you planning to give up on the ctidscan module and submit only the module written by Hanada-san on top of postgres_fdw? As I imagine that the goal is just to have a test module to run the APIs why would the module submitted by Hanada-san be that necessary? -- Michael
