On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2014-08-18 12:50:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> >> wrote: >> > You realize that you can pretty much recompute the offsets from the >> > sizes of the individual allocations anyway? >> >> Sure, if you know the segment base. Do you? > > Err? The offset doesn't give you the base either?
Oh! I thought you were printing actual pointer addresses. If you're just printing offsets relative to wherever the segment happens to be mapped, I don't care about that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
