Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-08-18 12:27:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Should we consider putting it into an extension rather than having
>> it in the core system? That would offer some additional protection
>> for production systems, which really shouldn't have much need for
>> this IMO.
> I'd considered that somewhere upthread and decided that it'd require
> exposing to much internals from shmem.c/dsm.c without a corresponding
> benefit.
Well, we could have the implementation code in those modules but not
provide any SQL-level access to it without installing an extension.
The only extra thing visible in the .h files would be a function or two.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
