* Shigeru Hanada (shigeru.han...@gmail.com) wrote: > Perhaps he meant to separate patches based on feature-based rule. IMO > if exposing utilities is essential for Custom Scan API in practical > meaning, IOW to implement and maintain an extension which implements > Custom Scan API, they should be go into the first patch. IIUC two > contrib modules are also PoC for the API, so part-2/3 patch should > contain only changes against contrib and its document.
That's what I was getting at, yes. > Besides that, some typo fixing are mixed in part-2 patch. They should > go into the part-1 patch where the typo introduced. Agreed. THanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature