2014-02-26 16:46 GMT+09:00 Kouhei Kaigai <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>: >> Just to come back to this- the other two "contrib module" patches, at least >> as I read over their initial submission, were *also* patching portions of >> backend code which it was apparently discovered that they needed. That's >> a good bit of my complaint regarding this approach. >> > ?? Sorry, are you still negative on the portion of backend patched > by the part-2 and part-3 portion??
Perhaps he meant to separate patches based on feature-based rule. IMO if exposing utilities is essential for Custom Scan API in practical meaning, IOW to implement and maintain an extension which implements Custom Scan API, they should be go into the first patch. IIUC two contrib modules are also PoC for the API, so part-2/3 patch should contain only changes against contrib and its document. Besides that, some typo fixing are mixed in part-2 patch. They should go into the part-1 patch where the typo introduced. -- Shigeru HANADA -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
