On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Such a thing would help COPY, so maybe it's worth a look
I have little doubt that a deferred insertion buffer of some kind could help performance on some workloads, though I suspect the buffer would have to be pretty big to make it worthwhile on a big COPY that generates mostly-random insertions. I think the question is not so much whether it's worth doing but where anyone's going to find the time to do it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
