On 29 October 2013 16:10, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Leonardo Francalanci <m_li...@yahoo.it> > wrote: >> I don't see much interest in insert-efficient indexes. > > Presumably someone will get around to implementing a btree index > insertion buffer one day. I think that would be a particularly > compelling optimization for us, because we could avoid ever inserting > index tuples that are already dead when the deferred insertion > actually occurs.
That's pretty much what the LSM-tree is. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
