On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I am speaking up now as this is the first time I am told I have to wait >>> another year for this feature to arrive. >> >> Really? You've never seen a patch punted to the next release before >> because it wasn't robust enough? Considering that I see your name >> mentioned in the 8.2 release notes, I find that a bit hard to believe. > > Hannu didn't say he hadn't seen a patch punted. He said this was the > first time he knew he would have to wait another year for the feature > to arrive.
Oh. I misunderstood what he was saying, then. When ANY patch is still pending after a month of CommitFest, everyone should assume it's in trouble. Triply so if it's a big patch. We are almost three months into this one, and the patch in question is very large. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
