On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 04/15/2012 05:46 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> >> Our problem is not lack of resource, it is ineffective >> delegation. As Hannu points out, he didn't know the patch would be >> rejected, so he didn't know help was needed to save something useful. >> I considered that the job of the CF manager, but perhaps it is was >> not. > > > Note that one of the influences on the "death march" here was lack of a > fully devoted CF manager for the full duration. I did some rabble rousing > to get things started in the usual way, but my time for this only budgeted > for six weeks in that role. And that was quite optimistic for this one. > > Trying to quantify how much time investment the CF manager role really > involves is one of my important projects to chew on. Whoever ends up doing > that should at least have an idea what scale of problem they're getting > into.
Again, if the CF manager role is too big, then we delegate. No reason why we can't have a CF team, with different people responsible for different areas. The key thing is working out how to mobilise the resources we have to best effect. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
