Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 16 15:22:05 -0300 2012: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:08:07AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > I agree with you that some worst case performance tests should be > > >> > done. Could you please say what you think the worst cases would be, so > > >> > those can be tested? That would avoid wasting time or getting anything > > >> > backwards. > > >> > > >> I've thought about this some and here's what I've come up with so far: > > > > > > I question whether we are in a position to do the testing necessary to > > > commit this for 9.2. > > > > Is anyone even working on testing it? > > No one I know of. I am just trying to set expectations that this still > has a long way to go.
A Command Prompt colleague is on it. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
