On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > I agree with you that some worst case performance tests should be >> > done. Could you please say what you think the worst cases would be, so >> > those can be tested? That would avoid wasting time or getting anything >> > backwards. >> >> I've thought about this some and here's what I've come up with so far: > > I question whether we are in a position to do the testing necessary to > commit this for 9.2.
Is anyone even working on testing it? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
