On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: >> 3) sepgsql is currently a bit hard to find in the documentation. >> www.postgresql.org website search doesn't find sepgsql and selinux only >> refers to an old PostgreSQL redhat bug in 2005 on bugzilla.redhat.com. I had >> to manually remember it was a contrib module. Also sepgsql isn't linked to >> at the SECURITY LABEL page. At the moment I'm unsure if I have seen all >> sepgsql related sgml-based documentation. >> > Improvement of documentation is an issue. > The wiki.postgresql.org should be an appropriate place, maybe. > > The reason why SECURITY LABEL does not point to sepgsql.sgml is > that it is general purpose infrastructure for all the upcoming label based > security mechanism, not only sepgsql. > It was our consensus in v9.1 development.
Actually, I think it's that way mostly because we committed the SECURITY LABEL stuff first. I'd be in favor of adding some kind of cross-link. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
