On 2011-07-20 16:54, Robert Haas wrote:

As to the first point, the other big problem with adding a syscache
here is that it could get really big.  I've worried about that issue
previously, and Yev's perplexity about where the memory is going is
not too reassuring.
Yeah I just realized that #buckets <> cache items stored, which makes some of the comments I made a bit strange. If the syscaches store everything that's looked up then the same 5MB memory usage under changing #buckets makes perfect sense.

regards,
Yeb


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to