On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > 2011/6/9 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: >>> The only modification by this patch to the core routine is a new >>> syscache for pg_seclabel system catalog. The SECLABELOID enables to >>> reference security label of the object using syscache interface. >> >> I believe we decided against that previously on the grounds that we >> don't want to add syscaches that might get really really big. In >> particular, there could be a LOT of labelled large objects floating >> around. >> > (Sorry, I missed to Cc: pgsql-hackers, so send again) > > As long as we use syscache mechanism to hold security label of > relation or other cached objects, do you think it cause no troubles?
Maybe, but why do we need it? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
