Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > That is simply a horrid idea. Just make it specify EXTENSION.
And VERSION too, finally. So any extension > >> and guessing >> the CONTROL file name from the EXTENSION name only occurs when CONTROL >> has not been provided. > > Here, on the other hand, I'm wondering why have two variables at all. > Is there any sane use-case for the control file to not be named the same > as the extension? It seems like that would accomplish little except to > sow confusion. > > regards, tom lane -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
