On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> More to the point, I'm not sure I like the creation of yet another DLL >> to deal with this. The reason this isn't just exported from the main >> backend is the same reason we created the libpqwalreceiver library I'm >> sure - bt that means we already have one. >> >> How about we just use this same source file, but compile and link it >> directly into both dblink and libpqwalreceiver? That'd leave us with >> one DLL less, making life easier. > > ISTM that we cannot compile dblink using USE_PGXS=1, if that DLL doesn't > exist in the installation directory. No?
I might have misinterpreted your point. You mean that the same source file defining something like pgwin32_PQexec should be placed in both contrib/dblink and src/backend/replication/libpqwalreceiver? If so, we can compile dblink using USE_PGXS without the DLL. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
