On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> ... (and many of the more >> significant remaining patches look like they are right up Tom's alley >> anyway). > > FWIW, if left to my own devices I will eventually get to everything > except the dblink, ecpg, and encoding/win32 patches. I don't intend > to touch any of those because there are other committers better > qualified to review them. (I don't actually think we have anybody > except Michael who's really familiar with ecpg.)
Thanks, I think that's helpful information. > However, if no other committers are working on it it's going to be > a long commitfest ... That is my concern as well. > The other problem is that most of the patches are not Ready for > Committer anyway. I (and hopefully the people who agreed to help with patch-chasing) can work on this, but given that there are 5 that are Ready for Committer and probably as many more that are close, and further given that in the past 7 days exactly 1 patch from the CommitFest has been committed, I'm not sure there's a real problem here. If you commit/bounce all 5 of those afternoon I will spend the evening making sure you have a few more to tackle tomorrow. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
