Robert Haas wrote: > - Hot Standby and Streaming Replication are both huge new features in > this CommitFest, and there seems to be a fair amount of activity > around both patches. Heikki previously expressed optimism about > getting Hot Standby done this CommitFest, but I am not sure whether he > is still feeling optimistic,
There's a lot of small things that need fixing, but nothing major. I'm not so much optimistic, but I think we should spend the extra effort required on hot standby to force it in in this commitfest. It's a big feature and it really could use some alpha-testing earlier rather than later. It would also leave time for any extra features or tweaks to be made in the later commitfests. OTOH, I'd hate to hold the commitfest hostage for that. Perhaps it should be returned to author at this point, I should move on to other patches to get the commitfest closed ASAP, and continue reviewing and polishing that right after the commitfest. > or what his feelings are about Streaming > Replication, which is currently waiting on Fujii Masao for a new > version. I'm undecided on whether walreceiver should be a subprocess of the startup process, or of postmaster as it was submitted. I'd appreciate if others would take a look into that too and give opinions. And then there's the small list of things I asked Fujii-san to work on. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
