* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Well, the examples I've looked at fit in 80 columns, but it's true that > all the identifiers involved were pretty short. The alternative I think > you're suggesting is
Yeah, I see that now. I guess you'd need a column identifier wider than
'Column Access Privileges' or so, which is almost asking for trouble
already, or a combination of grantee+privs+grantor greater than around
the same, which would require rolenames of >9 characters for grantee
and grantor, which is probably not that common. The new stuff added to
split the ACL across lines is pretty nice.
> which is definitely more compact horizontally, but I think it's harder
> to follow. It's also *less* compact vertically, which is not a
> negligible consideration either.
yea, I'd rather we provide more information on a given row than add
additional rows, but I also tend to run my DB-work terminals at
220x70 or so, which seems to indicate I'm in the minority. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
