Tom Lane escribió: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > As I mentioned in my other email, this is mainly for PostGIS, but it can > > certainly apply to other modules. Is this what we would recommend as an > > approach for these kinds of modules? I feel like that would give > > -hackers, or perhaps the PostGIS people, some heartburn, but maybe I'm > > wrong? > > If you have an idle evening you might want to peruse all the past > threads about developing better support for modules.
All the useful material in this area is linked to on the TODO list. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
