On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 20:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > gah, I find that to be terrible. If we wanted to compromise, I'd > > rather have \df do what it does today, to keep backwards-compat and > > not confuse users, and \dfU to do what I want 99% of the time. > > This seems to me to be the compromise most likely to dissatisfy everyone > the least ...
I could live with that. Although I really think we should review how it interacts with search paths, but that could be a 8.5 thing. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
