Hi, Tom Lane wrote: > We won't call it anything, because we never will or can implement that. > See the theory of relativity: the notion of exactly simultaneous events > at distinct locations isn't even well-defined
That has never been the point of the discussion. It's rather about the question if changes from transactions are guaranteed to be visible on remote nodes immediately after commit acknowledgment. Whether or not this is guaranteed, in both cases the term "synchronous replication" is commonly used, which is causing confusion. Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
