On 2008-12-13, at 13:07, Markus Wanner wrote:
However, that is a marketing decision [1], which should not be mixed with the technical discussion here. Speaking of a "synchronous commit" is utterly misleading, because the commit itself is exactly the thing that's *not* synchronous.
[1]: Some people like the term "virtually synchronous" for marketing purposes. That's at least half-ways technically correct.
Marketing people are virtually trustworthy, from my life experience. If you ask me, this is just preposterous. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
