Hi, Mark Mielke wrote: > Good answers, Markus. Thanks.
You are welcome. > So it looks like there is value to both ends of the spectrum, and while > I feel the most value would be in providing a very fast system that > scales near linear to the number of nodes in the system, even at the > expense of immediately visible transactions from all servers, I can > accept that sometimes the expectations are stricter and would appreciate > seeing an option to let me choose based upon my requirements. I absolutely agree to that. The original Postgres-R algorithm covers the eager (or virtually synchronous) part. I'm planning to extend it with a (fully) synchronous mode and let the user choose per transaction. Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
