Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Isn't the vacuum_delay_point() good enough?
> But that's in the outer loop ... I mean here:
You'd need one heckuva lot of lexemes in a tsvector to make that
important. Do we have CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in any other loops
over tsvector contents? I kinda doubt it ...
(I have no real objection to adding CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS there,
I'm just questioning the value.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
