Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Should we have a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() call in the inner loop of
> > compute_tsvector_stats?
>
> Isn't the vacuum_delay_point() good enough?
But that's in the outer loop ... I mean here:
Index: src/backend/tsearch/ts_typanalyze.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/alvherre/Code/cvs/pgsql/src/backend/tsearch/ts_typanalyze.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -c -p -r1.1 ts_typanalyze.c
*** src/backend/tsearch/ts_typanalyze.c 14 Jul 2008 00:51:45 -0000 1.1
--- src/backend/tsearch/ts_typanalyze.c 14 Jul 2008 04:59:59 -0000
*************** compute_tsvector_stats(VacAttrStats *sta
*** 206,211 ****
--- 206,213 ----
{
bool found;
+ CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
+
/* Construct a hash key */
hash_key.lexeme = lexemesptr + curentryptr->pos;
hash_key.length = curentryptr->len;
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
