Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > This isn't really about tools. It's about who wants to put in the > > day-after-day, year-after-year drudge work to maintain the queue. > > Whoever wants to do the work can pick their tools... > > I still think it would be best if the patch authors did the work. They > are the ones who care about the patch and want the review, and they're > in the best position to know what the status of a patch is. Others can > do it as well of course, in the spirit of a Wiki.
Does that move us in the direction of the patch tracker? That does raise the bar for patch submitters, though I would catch any patches that weren't in the tracker. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
