On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:28:35 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom lane said over on the concurrent psql thread: > >> If we do split them then there is going to be some added effort to > >> maintain the commit fest queue. > > > What exactly are we talking about here? It sounds to me as if my > > tracman email with modification might work for this. If not, o.k. > > but it seems to fit. > > This isn't really about tools. It's about who wants to put in the > day-after-day, year-after-year drudge work to maintain the queue. > Whoever wants to do the work can pick their tools... So you are saying, only one person should do this versus a team of individuals? That doesn't seem sustainable. Maybe I am misunderstanding what the root of the problem is and most likely what the requirements are but either way, there is a tool involved, even if it is vi. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
