On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:59:43 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Damn, this is starting to get to be a trend ... but, I can't but > agree 100% with this ... we *can* enforce, and I doubt it will have > much (if any) affect on the # of patches that come in, since ppl want > to see their work committed, and will follow any *reaonable* > procedure we have for them to do so ... > > Do other large projects accept patches 'ad hoc' like we do? > FreeBSD? Linux? KDE? > KDE is fairly structured. Linux... I don't know. I do know that at one time a very well known Alan slammed a very well known Linux for using his inbox as a patch queue (funny isn't it, no offense Bruce). FreeBSD I would think you would know better than I. However even Debian for all of its warts is *very* structured. Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
