On Jan 17, 2008 12:08 PM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Primary goal is ANSI SQL conformance (for me). Current PL/pgSQL isn't > > compatible and it will not be compatible in future (we have different > > implementation of SRF and really specific implementation of OUT > > parameters). But why artificially create bigger dif between PL/pgSQL > > and PL/SQL? > > > > I am sorry, I can't to speak in English gently (because my English is > > all else than English), and some my notes are maybe too much hard. > > If primary goal is ANSI SQL conformance shouldn't we be focusing on > pl/psm not plpgsql? (yes I am aware they are similar syntatically)
ANSI SQL conformance is not necessarily the only goal. Being able to easily port Oracle applications is pretty nice. Being able to run T-SQL in some fashion would be nice as well. merlin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
