-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:43:45 +0100 "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we develop PostgreSQL, but why create own syntax for all? Why? Only so > we develop PostgreSQL? We have different implementation and different > limit, but why create different syntax, I don't understand. It's like > Microsoft. Lot of things are little bit incompatible. O.k. hold on guys. I really don't care what you do with plpgsql. I don't use it unless I absolutely have to anyway. All I was doing was saying that: A. I could give flying donkey butt about being the Oracle-Compatible community. B. That "SWITCH" may be an alternate syntax because 15 years ago when I took a CS class and I did one chapter of C they had a SWITCH statement that resembles CASE. Please continue on. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHj4hVATb/zqfZUUQRAhbpAJ9+qwBAHqxwSCCeVzbRjKBiFTpVhQCdEX+j vrXiUgBeLQoBKx3s68214qw= =kc7c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
