-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:11:42 -0500 Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That would surely defeat the whole point of having this. We want to > have the same syntax as PL/SQL, not different syntax for the same > things. I'm sorry I thought we were developing PostgreSQL. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHj4RlATb/zqfZUUQRAmidAKCsRmGkQezCs+KqXOQ860V9g4jDnwCgkIKS 9qdY+ULKlRMucvxideWzjQE= =REm+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
