Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core dumps

[Martin Renters]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:31:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> After looking more closely I see that pg_restore has two different
> buffer overrun conditions in this one routine.  Attached is take two
> of my patch.
> 
> This would be a lot simpler and cleaner if _PrintData() simply didn't
> append a zero byte to the buffer contents.  Philip, is it actually
> necessary for it to do that?

This patch seems to fix the problem I was seeing.

Martin

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster