Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Oh, isn't this the code that pushes large-object bodies around? I >> should think the problem would've been noticed much sooner if not... > It does both, which is why I was also surprised. Hmm ... digging through the code, it does look like one of the possible destinations is ExecuteSqlCommandBuf, which is a bit schizo about whether it's dealing with a null-terminated string or not, but is likely to get ill if handed one that isn't. Okay, I'll commit what I have then. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core dumps Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core dumps Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core dumps Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core dumps Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core dumps Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core dumps Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core d... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restor... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restor... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restor... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restor... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restor... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core dumps Martin Renters