Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC

[Bruce Momjian]

> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My question was what are we needing to test?  If we can do only single writes
> > to the log, don't we prefer O_* to fsync, and the O_D* options over
> > plain O_*?  Am I confused?
> 
> I don't think we have enough data to conclude that with any certainty.

I just figured we knew the answers to above issues, that that the only
issue was multiple writes vs. fsync().

It is hard for me to imagine O_* being slower than fsync(), or fdatasync
being slower than fsync.  Are we not able to assume that?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly