Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My question was what are we needing to test? If we can do only single writes > to the log, don't we prefer O_* to fsync, and the O_D* options over > plain O_*? Am I confused? I don't think we have enough data to conclude that with any certainty. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SY... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SY... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be d... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SY... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be d... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Alfred Perlstein