Alfred Perlstein writes: > Sorry, what's a GUC? :) Grand Unified Configuration system It's basically a cute name for the achievement that there's now a single name space and interface for (almost) all postmaster run time configuration variables, -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be d... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SY... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be d... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done ... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be d... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SY... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC Mikheev, Vadim